JellyDogg wrote:I understand that the schedule will be determined tonight by draw from a hat.
Why is this a bad thing?
by changer banger » July 9th, 2008, 11:23 am
JellyDogg wrote:I understand that the schedule will be determined tonight by draw from a hat.

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 11:30 am
NINJA wrote:JellyDogg wrote:I understand that the schedule will be determined tonight by draw from a hat.
Why is this a bad thing?

by changer banger » July 9th, 2008, 11:35 am
KT12 wrote:the full schedule is out now. and looky looky. fwb is still played Scared Kickless (KA) that last game of the season, just like last time and just like they wanted.

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 11:39 am
NINJA wrote:KT12 wrote:the full schedule is out now. and looky looky. fwb is still played Scared Kickless (KA) that last game of the season, just like last time and just like they wanted.
... shocker.

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 11:40 am
KT12 wrote:NINJA wrote:JellyDogg wrote:I understand that the schedule will be determined tonight by draw from a hat.
Why is this a bad thing?
yeah i agree. why is that a bad thing? that's the fairest way to do it.
the full schedule is out now. and looky looky. fwb is still played Scared Kickless (KA) that last game of the season, just like last time and just like they wanted.

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 11:45 am
JellyDogg wrote:KT12 wrote:NINJA wrote:JellyDogg wrote:I understand that the schedule will be determined tonight by draw from a hat.
Why is this a bad thing?
yeah i agree. why is that a bad thing? that's the fairest way to do it.
the full schedule is out now. and looky looky. fwb is still played Scared Kickless (KA) that last game of the season, just like last time and just like they wanted.
Didn't say it was a bad thing, but I definitely think some consideration should be given to long-time rivals, and such. Apparently, the hat thought that as well

by changer banger » July 9th, 2008, 12:03 pm
JellyDogg wrote:Didn't say it was a bad thing, but I definitely think some consideration should be given to long-time rivals, and such. Apparently, the hat thought that as well

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 12:06 pm
KT12 wrote:i'm sorry, but you think it's fair to fix a schedule so preference is given to "long-time rivals"? that is the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard. a fair shot should be given to everyone. if you play them the first game, so be it- if you are as good as you think you are, then you should be able to do just fine that first game. and not to mention- fwb barely played in dominion before this. i would hardly say you guys are long-time rivals. just 2 good teams.

by changer banger » July 9th, 2008, 12:25 pm
JellyDogg wrote:Also, I wouldn't call it "fixing" the schedule, because often times in larger divisions they make sure all/most of the "good" teams play each other (thus having a more difficult schedule) while the newbs/bad teams play a more recreational schedule.

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 12:44 pm
NINJA wrote:Fair points, all of them. However...JellyDogg wrote:Also, I wouldn't call it "fixing" the schedule, because often times in larger divisions they make sure all/most of the "good" teams play each other (thus having a more difficult schedule) while the newbs/bad teams play a more recreational schedule.
... is the exact defitinion of fixing a schedule.
I can guarantee you that when this practice is done, not all captains are on board with it (much less notified). I realize that it's the board that ultimately makes these decisions, but doing something without support (or knowledge) of the captains is pretty shameful.
Also, some newb/bad teams may actually want to play the tougher teams and some of the better teams might want to play the newb/bad teams.

by FearTheFro » July 9th, 2008, 1:08 pm

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 1:38 pm
FroNoMo wrote:In a division where everybody plays everybody, why not "fix" the schedule based on what you know about the teams? If there's a brand new team and they have a name like "Bunting Is For Homos, Let's Just Get Drunk", you may not want to have them open the season with FWB, Blazers, and KA right off the bat, when there's a perfectly good Fannie Kickers for them to play. One of the worst things that can happen is for a less competitive team to get shell-shocked the first couple weeks and then not want to come back afterward.
I get all the Team Awesome girls mixed up, which one are you?

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 1:48 pm
NINJA wrote:I can guarantee you that when this practice is done, not all captains are on board with it (much less notified). I realize that it's the board that ultimately makes these decisions, but doing something without support (or knowledge) of the captains is pretty shameful.
NINJA wrote:Also, some newb/bad teams may actually want to play the tougher teams and some of the better teams might want to play the newb/bad teams.
KT12 wrote:and how do you classify who the "more competitive teams" are? we've got a whole bunch of new teams this season. how do you rank some teams over other teams when the season hasn't started yet?
KT12 wrote:for example, last season, fwb and ka got paired up together to play the last game of the season, apparently b/c they were the 2 "best" teams. yeah, it might have turned out that way, but the blazers tied fwb during the regular season and lost by one in the playoffs. we had never even played fwb before, so how did you know fwb was the better team before the season even started?

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 1:52 pm
KT12 wrote:let's just put it like this. i just find if really really convenient that during the 2nd week of last season, when FWB had a bye, several of their players were out of town. none of the other teams had the opportunity to organize the schedule around their personal life.
KT12 wrote:no one's angry about it, but a lot of people just want to do it the fair way this time around.

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 1:58 pm
JellyDogg wrote:KT12 wrote:let's just put it like this. i just find if really really convenient that during the 2nd week of last season, when FWB had a bye, several of their players were out of town. none of the other teams had the opportunity to organize the schedule around their personal life.
Maybe they were out of town because we had a bye...
KT12 wrote:no one's angry about it, but a lot of people just want to do it the fair way this time around.
I definitely detect some bitterness, if not anger. This discussion has lasted too long to just be a simple difference of opinion on division scheduling practices (as fascinating a topic as it would seem to be)

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 2:17 pm
KT12 wrote:to your first point. yeah um, i highly doubt it.
all i know is that there has been b*tching going on as to how paul did the schedule this time and it's annoying, b/c it's the absolute fairest way to do it. that's the only reason this all came up in the first place.
secondly, it wouldn't be so long of a thread if you'd just admit eddie and i are right? ha ha.

by -APBT- » July 9th, 2008, 4:24 pm

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 4:57 pm
-KA- wrote:I don't care who we play, when or where we play them, my only question is WHO'S NEXT!?

by changer banger » July 9th, 2008, 5:00 pm
JellyDogg wrote:Name me one thing you can get all captains to agree on? Name me one thing you can even get all captains to respond to? Most of the time, the BoD can only infer what teams want. The best thing the board can do is try to give as many of the teams as much of what they want as they can. The point is for everybody to have fun, and different teams have different ideas of what "fun" is to them.
JellyDogg wrote:I've never heard of a division where none of the tough teams played newb/bad teams and none of the newb/bad teams played tough teams--the ratio was just different for each set. Having said that, it is extremely rare for newb/bad teams to want to play tough teams. Every year in Alexandria, we have new/bad teams that consider quitting when they play Gonzo, because that's not what most new teams sign up for. They don't consider that type of competition "fun," while the Gonzo's of the world don't consider playing against crappy teams "fun." The point is for everyone to have fun, and in my experience that never happens when a tough team plays a newb/bad team.

by You Know Me » July 9th, 2008, 5:16 pm

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 6:00 pm

by FearTheFro » July 9th, 2008, 6:04 pm
JellyDogg wrote:You and Katy like randomness to eliminate any (perceived) biases, I like a schedule that tries to accommodate as much of the division as possible in terms of what their individual teams are there for. Both methods have pros and cons. My method is just better

by You Know Me » July 9th, 2008, 6:52 pm
FroNoMo wrote:JellyDogg wrote:You and Katy like randomness to eliminate any (perceived) biases, I like a schedule that tries to accommodate as much of the division as possible in terms of what their individual teams are there for. Both methods have pros and cons. My method is just better
Katy's method is way hotter than yours.

by JellyDogg » July 9th, 2008, 7:36 pm
You Know Me wrote:FroNoMo wrote:JellyDogg wrote:You and Katy like randomness to eliminate any (perceived) biases, I like a schedule that tries to accommodate as much of the division as possible in terms of what their individual teams are there for. Both methods have pros and cons. My method is just better
Katy's method is way hotter than yours.
Agreed, she's totally hotter than you, Mark, no question.

by FWB_Brian » July 9th, 2008, 8:53 pm

by KT12 » July 9th, 2008, 11:42 pm
FWB_Brian wrote:Boy, I've always been nice to KT and the Blazers (Team Awesome) but you guys really have a chip on your shoulder towards FWB that I don't get.
1) Eddie. A lot of decisions have already been made this season without captain or even board approval and I'm the VP! But that's fairly standard from what I've seen and besides, committees are normally the worst way to get things done, unless there is a serious trust issue with the dictatorship (and I trust Paul).
2) 1st Lady Katy, those are some harsh words. Please don't throw stones when you sleep with the brick house
3) Both ways of doing the schedule turned out "fair" results. The schedule last season was reviewed by the board and multiple suggestions and subsequent changes were made. I never made any decision unilaterally. No criticism of fairness was ever raised until now, on a public message board. To come on here and say a lot of people had a problem with it is sketchy, considering the number of people who could have weighed in on the way things were set up and DID weigh in on other details of the schedule.
Since you play each team twice, random draw isn't such a big deal. So it is really a moot point for this fall season.

by FearTheFro » July 9th, 2008, 11:57 pm
KT12 wrote: ... am I not allowed to speak my mind then? B/c if that's the case, I'll dump his ass so quick...


by -APBT- » July 10th, 2008, 7:38 am
You Know Me wrote:I agree with everybody. You all make good points. However, I know for a fact that Aaron's statment about not getting any more amped or anxious for one team from another is not true. At least one or two games that KA played in the Spring season...
...O'Doyle Rules!!!

by JellyDogg » July 10th, 2008, 8:24 am
KT12 wrote:This site seems to be getting me into trouble so I should probably hold back from posting anymore!

by changer banger » July 10th, 2008, 8:42 am
JellyDogg wrote:My method is just better

by JellyDogg » July 10th, 2008, 8:47 am
NINJA wrote:JellyDogg wrote:My method is just better
I humbly disagree - you do realize that there's only one way to solve this, right? It involves a lot of beer, some cups, maybe a quarter, strawberry jelly, probably some ping pong balls, and a donkey.
See you tonight. I'll go to the CVS early. You find a donkey.

by You Know Me » July 10th, 2008, 9:06 am
NINJA wrote:JellyDogg wrote:My method is just better
I humbly disagree - you do realize that there's only one way to solve this, right? It involves a lot of beer, some cups, maybe a quarter, strawberry jelly, probably some ping pong balls, and a donkey.
See you tonight. I'll go to the CVS early. You find a donkey.

by FearTheFro » July 10th, 2008, 9:07 am
You Know Me wrote:NINJA wrote:JellyDogg wrote:My method is just better
I humbly disagree - you do realize that there's only one way to solve this, right? It involves a lot of beer, some cups, maybe a quarter, strawberry jelly, probably some ping pong balls, and a donkey.
See you tonight. I'll go to the CVS early. You find a donkey.
Ok, I totally understand everything else, but what are you going to do with the quarter?

by changer banger » July 10th, 2008, 9:12 am
You Know Me wrote:Ok, I totally understand everything else, but what are you going to do with the quarter?

by FearTheFro » July 10th, 2008, 11:07 am

by You Know Me » July 10th, 2008, 3:39 pm
FroNoMo wrote:Any scores from Wed. night?
(AKA Dominion Lite)

by FearTheFro » July 10th, 2008, 3:43 pm
You Know Me wrote:FroNoMo wrote:Any scores from Wed. night?
(AKA Dominion Lite)
Oznog 2 vs DOD 0
Looking to score 1 vs Moby kicks 0
Jager bombs 7 vs Reston kickers 0


by FWB_Brian » July 10th, 2008, 4:36 pm

by You Know Me » July 11th, 2008, 7:32 am
FWB_Brian wrote:DOD supposedly was going to be improved this year. They played us tough when we were short-handed last season. I expect they'll compete for the #2 spot on Wed night.

by FearTheFro » July 11th, 2008, 8:21 am
You Know Me wrote:FWB_Brian wrote:DOD supposedly was going to be improved this year. They played us tough when we were short-handed last season. I expect they'll compete for the #2 spot on Wed night.
Naw, Oznog had most of their core people at the beach this week. The'yre still the team to beat on Wednesdays. Jager Bombs will give them a run, but I doubt they can beat a regular Gonzo squad. Demon's are most likely 3rd, unless they drop the ball and lose some crazy one's.
