by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 9:57 am
by changer banger » April 27th, 2010, 10:05 am

by Baller4Life » April 27th, 2010, 10:44 am

by Zak » April 27th, 2010, 10:52 am
Baller4Life wrote:Scratch previous post, I lack the ability to read.
In other news, while it is allowed can we please refer to man bunting as "munting."

by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 11:39 am
Baller4Life wrote:Scratch previous post, I lack the ability to read.
In other news, while it is allowed can we please refer to man bunting as "munting."
by Baller4Life » April 27th, 2010, 12:10 pm
Zak wrote:Baller4Life wrote:Scratch previous post, I lack the ability to read.
In other news, while it is allowed can we please refer to man bunting as "munting."
what will you call chick bunting?

by Zak » April 27th, 2010, 12:13 pm
Baller4Life wrote:Zak wrote:Baller4Life wrote:Scratch previous post, I lack the ability to read.
In other news, while it is allowed can we please refer to man bunting as "munting."
what will you call chick bunting?
I've thought that one out before, but then realized that somewhere in Title IX is the ability for chicks to bunt without being judged. Therefore, no awkward word combination is needed.

by changer banger » April 27th, 2010, 12:15 pm
Zak wrote:but why is a dude being judged for bunting when a chick isn't?

by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 12:19 pm
by Baller4Life » April 27th, 2010, 12:26 pm
Biased Media wrote:I was going to do a Mailbag where I answer people's questions about bunting... but then I decided against it, figuring that too much is being made about it anyway.

by Zak » April 27th, 2010, 12:34 pm
NINJA wrote:Zak wrote:but why is a dude being judged for bunting when a chick isn't?
Gender discrimination. Being in the majority makes you more of a target.
You white dudes have it rough.

by Stratoboozer » April 27th, 2010, 12:36 pm

by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 12:40 pm
Zak wrote:NINJA wrote:Zak wrote:but why is a dude being judged for bunting when a chick isn't?
Gender discrimination. Being in the majority makes you more of a target.
You white dudes have it rough.
I thought it was based of the assumption that dudes where better kickers than chicks and that the term munting implies that man bunts are some how better than chick bunts. Chick bunts can be just as good if not better than dudes bunt, so I see reason to differentiate between the two.
by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 12:41 pm
Stratoboozer wrote:So... if bunting doesn't look cool, but high socks look cool, then will bunting while wearing high socks make one look average?
by Zak » April 27th, 2010, 12:42 pm
Stratoboozer wrote:So... if bunting doesn't look cool, but high socks look cool, then will bunting while wearing high socks make one look average?

by Stratoboozer » April 27th, 2010, 12:57 pm
Biased Media wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:So... if bunting doesn't look cool, but high socks look cool, then will bunting while wearing high socks make one look average?
I think Ryan once said, "Just because you wear Under Armour" doesn't mean you're athletic.

by kim dude » April 27th, 2010, 1:00 pm
by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 1:07 pm
Stratoboozer wrote:Biased Media wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:So... if bunting doesn't look cool, but high socks look cool, then will bunting while wearing high socks make one look average?
I think Ryan once said, "Just because you wear Under Armour" doesn't mean you're athletic.
Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
in reference to coolness...
A=knee socks and B=bunting
where A=TRUE and B=FALSE (not cool)
then A ∧ B = F
Therefore, bunting while wearing knee socks is NOT cool.
I thought about doing a binary table, but that may be over some people's heads.
)
by changer banger » April 27th, 2010, 1:20 pm
Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:


by Stratoboozer » April 27th, 2010, 1:23 pm
NINJA wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
... is it bad that I got a bit of a chub with this?

by changer banger » April 27th, 2010, 1:26 pm
Stratoboozer wrote:NINJA wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
... is it bad that I got a bit of a chub with this?
Yes.

by Stratoboozer » April 27th, 2010, 1:34 pm

by Ol Dirty Roy » April 27th, 2010, 1:40 pm
NINJA wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
... is it bad that I got a bit of a chub with this?

by Will Menace » April 27th, 2010, 1:47 pm

by Festa » April 27th, 2010, 1:51 pm
will i am wrote:01000100010000110010000001000011011000010111000001101001011101000110000101101100001000000110100101110011001000000100000101110111011001010111001101101111011011010110010100100001
by Festa » April 28th, 2010, 7:07 am
by changer banger » April 28th, 2010, 8:33 am
Ol Dirty Roy wrote:NINJA wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
... is it bad that I got a bit of a chub with this?
What doesn't give you a chub?

by Ol Dirty Roy » April 28th, 2010, 9:01 am
NINJA wrote:Ol Dirty Roy wrote:NINJA wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
... is it bad that I got a bit of a chub with this?
What doesn't give you a chub?
Mario bangin' it out with the Princess?

by Festa » April 28th, 2010, 9:07 am
by sweetdee » April 28th, 2010, 10:21 am
Biased Media wrote:Where's OSC been? They've been quiet this week.

by changer banger » April 28th, 2010, 10:48 am
Ol Dirty Roy wrote:NINJA wrote:Ol Dirty Roy wrote:NINJA wrote:Stratoboozer wrote:Of course, I could break out my ol' discrete math book and use a truth table:
... is it bad that I got a bit of a chub with this?
What doesn't give you a chub?
Mario bangin' it out with the Princess?
Liar...

by Festa » April 28th, 2010, 11:38 am
sweetdee wrote:Biased Media wrote:Where's OSC been? They've been quiet this week.
Ryan and I are in finals mode. I'm assuming Lloyd and Troy are still hungover from last week's game since they were blackout by 6pm last Thursday. No idea about anyone else...
by Will Menace » April 28th, 2010, 12:13 pm
Biased Media wrote:Lloyd doesn't remember throwing beer on people?


