Request: Drop required age to 18 (from 21)
Rule: 7.2.1 - "All players must be 21 and have current adequate health insurance."
Thoughts?
Admin
by admin » October 20th, 2010, 5:24 pm
by Zak » October 20th, 2010, 5:27 pm
Kolanko_25 wrote:Of course you would. If an EC player said 2+2=5 you'd agree.

by Trey it Up » October 20th, 2010, 7:09 pm

by C-Rab Squaring » October 20th, 2010, 7:56 pm

by Zak » October 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Hoboken3b wrote:Adequate health care is going to be very tough to police. I know circuit players who didn't or currently don't have health insurance. Don't circuit tournament operators purchase insurance and get waivers filled out?
Kolanko_25 wrote:Of course you would. If an EC player said 2+2=5 you'd agree.

by PittsBurgheR » October 21st, 2010, 8:56 am

by The Slam » October 21st, 2010, 8:59 am

by Zak » October 21st, 2010, 9:01 am
Kolanko_25 wrote:Of course you would. If an EC player said 2+2=5 you'd agree.

by PittsBurgheR » October 21st, 2010, 9:04 am
The Slam wrote:Not a lawyer, but does it make you liable for anything else?
I could see it being an issue
- let's say you bring beer to the field, someone that's 19 takes a beer, cops come by, etc
- you set up a post party event, theres an open bar to players. Player A (19) shows up (the place doesnt check ID) - who gets in trouble if the person is later arrested for drunken disorderly conduct? - is it the bar who supplied the liquor OR the circuit for paying for the liquor (it was an open bar)?

by JellyDogg » October 21st, 2010, 9:14 am

by Kickbot » October 21st, 2010, 9:34 am
by Jared It Up! » October 21st, 2010, 10:09 am
JellyDogg wrote:I don't think insurance will be an issue for this. Most people under the age of 21 are covered under their parents' insurance. It's more likely for people over 21 to be without insurance.
The alcohol issue I don't know. I didn't think you were allowed to bring alcohol to the field at a Circuit event (not that that stops anyone). I would think it's the bar's responsibility to check that people are over 21, although I think we could help out with colored wristbands in the afterparties (distinguishing between over 21 and under 21).


by Smashley » October 22nd, 2010, 12:08 pm
AZ_Zak wrote:Slam, in your second example the bartender is ultimately liable if cops check the 19 year old's id and prove he was drinking in the bar.

by -APBT- » October 22nd, 2010, 12:14 pm
