Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:So you're saying that since Admin is on OSC that Bill makes every decision according to what's best for the Circuit instead of what's best for OSC?
Let me write in short sentences for you. You just ranted about how OSC is anti-Circuit. Admin plays for OSC. Admin founded the Circuit. Admin wouldn't play for a team that is anti his own business.
So you think Admin is in favor of two teams combining to make one bigger/better team? You think he is in favor of $500 in admission fees instead of $1,000? You think over the course of five tournaments, he's in favor of $2,500 less in the Circuit bank account? You think that applying OSC's decision to cannibalize iB to all Circuit teams is a model for long term Circuit success?
There were approximately 100 Circuit teams last year. You think a long term goal should be for each team to combine with one or more teams to create larger and better teams. You think it's in the Circuit's best interest to have 50 or fewer teams instead of 100 teams? Is all of this correct?
The Circuit won't last if the same two teams win every tournament. Now they won't. More teams that can win is better for the Circuit.
I believe four different teams won an event last year. This year it'll likely be 5-7 different teams.