by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 8:44 am


by Paniky 69er » February 10th, 2010, 8:47 am

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 8:49 am


by Paniky 69er » February 10th, 2010, 8:52 am

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 8:54 am
Paniky Trey wrote:I know that MB is pumped to prove to RR that FC was a fluke.


by Paniky 69er » February 10th, 2010, 8:58 am

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 9:14 am


by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 9:29 am


by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 9:32 am
The Quiet One wrote:I should have just booked my flight a week earlier so I could watch this game and play vs. Balls Deeper.


by flades » February 10th, 2010, 9:36 am

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 9:38 am
flades wrote:I am most interested to see what the new additions on both teams will contribute and how they effect the outcome. Jimmybeans/J Ro/Nik etc. for MBs and Joe/JD/High School (if he plays) for RR. Defensively we're lining up pretty much the same but both offenses are much more potent than they have been in past seasons (although we haven't really shown it yet). I have to admit Meatballs offensive lineup is pretty damn scary with the above additions to an already scary lineup.


by machinegunkelly » February 10th, 2010, 9:39 am

by -TK- » February 10th, 2010, 9:43 am
flades wrote:I also predict that if we win, it will DEFINITELY be because the Meatballs "didn't execute" and "get their bunts down" (MeatballKevin) hehe

by Zak » February 10th, 2010, 9:45 am
machinegunkelly wrote:U can't stop pow u can only hope to contain him

by flades » February 10th, 2010, 9:46 am
Tweasy wrote:flades wrote:I am most interested to see what the new additions on both teams will contribute and how they effect the outcome. Jimmybeans/J Ro/Nik etc. for MBs and Joe/JD/High School (if he plays) for RR. Defensively we're lining up pretty much the same but both offenses are much more potent than they have been in past seasons (although we haven't really shown it yet). I have to admit Meatballs offensive lineup is pretty damn scary with the above additions to an already scary lineup.
You couldn't ask for a better game before SoFL. No scrimmage or practice can give you what this game will give you.

by Karl » February 10th, 2010, 9:57 am


by AmericanMike » February 10th, 2010, 9:59 am


by -TK- » February 10th, 2010, 10:02 am
flades wrote:No doubt.
So everyone is ready for it, the other Meatball excuse will be that they play 18 players vs. our 13/14. While granted, it is a slight advantage to get to the top of the order quicker, when you are the Meatballs and EVERY PERSON ON YOUR TEAM is virtually the same as the top of the order, this advantage is minimalized

by Zak » February 10th, 2010, 10:05 am
ShelanderTK wrote:flades wrote:No doubt.
So everyone is ready for it, the other Meatball excuse will be that they play 18 players vs. our 13/14. While granted, it is a slight advantage to get to the top of the order quicker, when you are the Meatballs and EVERY PERSON ON YOUR TEAM is virtually the same as the top of the order, this advantage is minimalized
So, you're only playing 13 or 14? Nice.

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 10:06 am
Zak wrote:ShelanderTK wrote:flades wrote:No doubt.
So everyone is ready for it, the other Meatball excuse will be that they play 18 players vs. our 13/14. While granted, it is a slight advantage to get to the top of the order quicker, when you are the Meatballs and EVERY PERSON ON YOUR TEAM is virtually the same as the top of the order, this advantage is minimalized
So, you're only playing 13 or 14? Nice.
Well they have people who "don't like playing in the competative games".



by -TK- » February 10th, 2010, 10:10 am
Tweasy wrote:Zak wrote:ShelanderTK wrote:flades wrote:No doubt.
So everyone is ready for it, the other Meatball excuse will be that they play 18 players vs. our 13/14. While granted, it is a slight advantage to get to the top of the order quicker, when you are the Meatballs and EVERY PERSON ON YOUR TEAM is virtually the same as the top of the order, this advantage is minimalized
So, you're only playing 13 or 14? Nice.
Well they have people who "don't like playing in the competative games".
They do have lives outside of kickball

by Paniky 69er » February 10th, 2010, 10:13 am

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 10:19 am
flades wrote:Tweasy wrote:What is your prediction Flades?
3-2 RR


by -TK- » February 10th, 2010, 10:22 am

by Paniky 69er » February 10th, 2010, 10:26 am

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 10:26 am
ShelanderTK wrote:And btw Flades... With Riff Raff cutting down your lineup to 13 or 14 so that you and the top get up 3 times it's a huge advantage against any team. You saying that the advantage is minimalized against the MEATBALLS sounds silly to me, simply because you wouldn't cut your lineup against a team that wasn't strong top to bottom- I mean, that's why you're cutting your lineup right?


by -TK- » February 10th, 2010, 10:29 am
Paniky Trey wrote:Cutting your lineup is always an advantage, but particularly for teams without much depth.

by Dematas » February 10th, 2010, 10:33 am
ShelanderTK wrote:Paniky Trey wrote:Cutting your lineup is always an advantage, but particularly for teams without much depth.
Yeah, but what I'm saying is... Teams like Riff Raff don't cut their lineup against teams without depth... They cut their lineup against teams with depth, so saying that it doesn't matter as much against a team like MEATBALLS is not only BS, but also an excuse to defend cutting their roster cause they know they're gonna get shit for it.

by Zak » February 10th, 2010, 10:33 am
ShelanderTK wrote:Paniky Trey wrote:Cutting your lineup is always an advantage, but particularly for teams without much depth.
Yeah, but what I'm saying is... Teams like Riff Raff don't cut their lineup against teams without depth... They cut their lineup against teams with depth, so saying that it doesn't matter as much against a team like MEATBALLS is not only BS, but also an excuse to defend cutting their roster cause they know they're gonna get shit for it.

by JellyDogg » February 10th, 2010, 10:35 am
ShelanderTK wrote:Yeah, but what I'm saying is... Teams like Riff Raff don't cut their lineup against teams without depth... They cut their lineup against teams with depth, so saying that it doesn't matter as much against a team like MEATBALLS is not only BS, but also an excuse to defend cutting their roster cause they know they're gonna get shit for it.

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 10:37 am
JellyDogg wrote:ShelanderTK wrote:Yeah, but what I'm saying is... Teams like Riff Raff don't cut their lineup against teams without depth... They cut their lineup against teams with depth, so saying that it doesn't matter as much against a team like MEATBALLS is not only BS, but also an excuse to defend cutting their roster cause they know they're gonna get shit for it.
As well they should. Last I checked everybody on the team pays the same $60+ to play.


by Zak » February 10th, 2010, 10:39 am

by JellyDogg » February 10th, 2010, 10:40 am
Tweasy wrote:And it is in the WAKA rules that everyone must be in the kicking lineup if they show to play. You can't get benched offensively

by Tweasy H Whoa » February 10th, 2010, 10:42 am
Zak wrote:Damn it I'm getting tired of saying it, where's PoW to state that people on Riff Raff sit themselves and that Gussack doesn't do the line up cutting?


