by J Hard » December 5th, 2007, 9:51 am

by J Hard » December 5th, 2007, 9:52 am

by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 9:56 am
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by J Hard » December 5th, 2007, 10:15 am

by FearTheFro » December 5th, 2007, 10:21 am
JHard29 wrote:First kicker of our game against Bacon Bits, bunt, safe at first. The ball is underthrown and gets past the first baseman. Runner gets second, possibly third if the ball doesn't go out of play, right? WRONG. Oakley Hall takes it upon himself to kick the ball back to the first baseman. Runner did not advance (and was eventually stranded at 3rd).
I told Oakley that this topic was singlehandedly going to get me to 1,000 posts on the MB.

by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 10:23 am
JHard29 wrote:I am getting mileage out of this...Mileage.
By the way, Bo Peep, I'd appreciate it if you didn't talk about how creepy I am as a date on the forums. I'll respond to it in your thread, but you're really blowing up my spot here. How am I supposed to spin my game on the rest of the ladies when you're spreading egregious lies about me?
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by Kickbot » December 5th, 2007, 10:24 am
JHard29 wrote:First kicker of our game against Bacon Bits, bunt, safe at first. The ball is underthrown and gets past the first baseman. Runner gets second, possibly third if the ball doesn't go out of play, right? WRONG. Oakley Hall takes it upon himself to kick the ball back to the first baseman. Runner did not advance (and was eventually stranded at 3rd).
I told Oakley that this topic was singlehandedly going to get me to 1,000 posts on the MB.

by Diffles Reject » December 5th, 2007, 10:38 am
Kickbot wrote:I'm so ashamed.

by BigEasy » December 5th, 2007, 10:40 am

by Kickbot » December 5th, 2007, 10:43 am
McAHHHsome wrote:Kickbot wrote:I'm so ashamed.
wow, I was waiting for the part where Oak lays down the smack as to why he did what he did and why it was the right, nay, awesome thing to do.
I am beyond disappointed.
by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 10:44 am
TheBigEasy wrote:smacked by cheese...
I just changed my ballot to oakley for best play.
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 10:49 am
FearTheFro wrote:To reach 1000 posts, you need a thread topic with greater MOmentum.


by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 10:53 am
flip c*up yours wrote:FearTheFro wrote:To reach 1000 posts, you need a thread topic with greater MOmentum.
I like the way you think
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by Lost_Sage » December 5th, 2007, 10:54 am
BoPeep wrote:flip c*up yours wrote:FearTheFro wrote:To reach 1000 posts, you need a thread topic with greater MOmentum.
I like the way you think
10-4. There's nothing like some good MO talk to get a thread really pumping.
by BigEasy » December 5th, 2007, 10:55 am

by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 10:57 am
Lost_Sage wrote:We do need to overcompensate for the dearth of MOvement in that activity ... I suppose talking about it is a second-best alternative ...BoPeep wrote:flip c*up yours wrote:FearTheFro wrote:To reach 1000 posts, you need a thread topic with greater MOmentum.
I like the way you think
10-4. There's nothing like some good MO talk to get a thread really pumping.
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 11:14 am
BoPeep wrote:I'm hoping that the EOSP provides MOre opportunities...


by FearTheFro » December 5th, 2007, 11:19 am
flip c*up yours wrote:BoPeep wrote:I'm hoping that the EOSP provides MOre opportunities...
Stop making me jealous...

by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 11:30 am
FearTheFro wrote:flip c*up yours wrote:BoPeep wrote:I'm hoping that the EOSP provides MOre opportunities...
Stop making me jealous...
There's never MOing in our ESOPs in Northern VA.
Just seemingly endless dance-offs.
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by Karl » December 5th, 2007, 11:40 am

by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 11:40 am
FearTheFro wrote:There's never MOing in our ESOPs in Northern VA.
Just seemingly endless dance-offs.


by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 11:41 am
BoPeep wrote:That's not too shabby.
What if we had an MO-off?


by Choo Choo Charlie » December 5th, 2007, 11:46 am
flip c*up yours wrote:BoPeep wrote:That's not too shabby.
What if we had an MO-off?
Oh man. I definitely would have been up for that!
Jared H. Whoa wrote:charlie did a good job. Post like crazy, meet a girl, then stop posting.


by FearTheFro » December 5th, 2007, 11:49 am
Choo Choo Charlie wrote:flip c*up yours wrote:BoPeep wrote:That's not too shabby.
What if we had an MO-off?
Oh man. I definitely would have been up for that!
choo choo checking in: when we were in college three girls decide to have an MO off. for senior week they kept track of who had more MOs. first they all MOed with all of us friends and then it got interesting when they were tied and needed to seek out strangers.

by Choo Choo Charlie » December 5th, 2007, 11:52 am
FearTheFro wrote:Choo Choo Charlie wrote:flip c*up yours wrote:BoPeep wrote:That's not too shabby.
What if we had an MO-off?
Oh man. I definitely would have been up for that!
choo choo checking in: when we were in college three girls decide to have an MO off. for senior week they kept track of who had more MOs. first they all MOed with all of us friends and then it got interesting when they were tied and needed to seek out strangers.
They wouldn't be strangers for long.
Jared H. Whoa wrote:charlie did a good job. Post like crazy, meet a girl, then stop posting.


by Jared It Up! » December 5th, 2007, 11:55 am


by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 12:01 pm
Choo Choo Charlie wrote:Oh man. I definitely would have been up for that!


by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 12:11 pm
flip c*up yours wrote:
In college (my freshman year), my soccer team informed us newbies that we were to keep track of our MO's during the season. We also had a another game we played involving MO's, HU's and ti^2 that I can discuss at a later time.
Well, we had no idea that the coaches knew about the tracking system too.
One night while we were at dinner after a game (approx. mid-way through the season), the captains asked each of us freshman to report our numbers. There were 5 of us total - counts were 2, 3, 0, 1...and then they got to me.
I had 9 or 10 already.
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.



by Manther Eater » December 5th, 2007, 12:42 pm
JHard29 wrote:I am getting mileage out of this...Mileage.
By the way, Bo Peep, I'd appreciate it if you didn't talk about how creepy I am as a date on the forums. I'll respond to it in your thread, but you're really blowing up my spot here. How am I supposed to spin my game on the rest of the ladies when you're spreading egregious lies about me?


by Karl » December 5th, 2007, 12:48 pm

by MO-Peep » December 5th, 2007, 12:50 pm
RCKarl wrote:yeah, this thread had real potential. alas, someone couldn't stay jhard long enough to get the job done
<---Likes to MO wrote:I LOVE ANGEL.
That is all.

by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 12:50 pm
BoPeep wrote:Is there an emoticon for "I'm not worthy"?


by J Hard » December 5th, 2007, 12:57 pm

by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 1:02 pm
JHard29 wrote:Listen, how can I stay mad at Oakley when my mad about Oakley thread turns into a girls MO'ing and turning to lesbians thread?
I can't, is the answer.


by The Ro » December 5th, 2007, 1:02 pm


by The Ro » December 5th, 2007, 1:03 pm
flip c*up yours wrote:JHard29 wrote:Listen, how can I stay mad at Oakley when my mad about Oakley thread turns into a girls MO'ing and turning to lesbians thread?
I can't, is the answer.
Well played sir.


by flip c*up yours » December 5th, 2007, 1:04 pm
the devil's ro. wrote:speaking of which. maggie! we're going to be in miami together! i can 'save' you from another MO!


by Karl » December 5th, 2007, 1:24 pm
JHard29 wrote:Listen, how can I stay mad at Oakley when my mad about Oakley thread turns into a girls MO'ing and turning to lesbians thread?
I can't, is the answer.

