by sedlak5 » December 29th, 2011, 2:18 pm

by Return of Ctiger » December 29th, 2011, 2:51 pm

by Trey it Up » December 29th, 2011, 7:24 pm

by Captain_Relax » December 30th, 2011, 12:54 pm
Zen Trey wrote:Panik won't be coming.
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk

by jspur317 » December 31st, 2011, 9:16 pm

by J-Hasty » January 2nd, 2012, 6:07 pm

by Zak » January 2nd, 2012, 7:09 pm

by krabbas » January 2nd, 2012, 9:04 pm

by Zak » January 3rd, 2012, 12:23 am
Typod wrote:I thought they seeded based on region

by J-Hasty » January 3rd, 2012, 1:12 am

by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 6:52 am
J-Hasty wrote:Really I always feel like the number one seeds in a bracket are picked and then a random draw from that? Hence why meatballs and panic are never in the same bracket.
Who's gonna get the pool of death cause I have a feeling there will be one!!!
by Jersey3bFP » January 3rd, 2012, 8:55 am

by admin » January 3rd, 2012, 9:25 am
by jdeep » January 3rd, 2012, 9:45 am
Jersey3bFP wrote:I'm also trying to figure out how you'd seed a team like JKI over OSC and NYSH. Understandably they have made some great off season moves and will be a force this year in the circuit but you can't seed on speculation. You have to go off of the circuit last year. This being the first tournament of 2012 the seeding should be determined by how teams finished last year.

by admin » January 3rd, 2012, 9:50 am
krabbas wrote:J-Hasty wrote:Really I always feel like the number one seeds in a bracket are picked and then a random draw from that? Hence why meatballs and panic are never in the same bracket.
Who's gonna get the pool of death cause I have a feeling there will be one!!!
Just looking at the list of teams signed up, there will probably be multiple "pools of death". I can't wait for this damn tourney.
by JellyDogg » January 3rd, 2012, 9:52 am
Jersey3bFP wrote:I'm also trying to figure out how you'd seed a team like JKI over OSC and NYSH. Understandably they have made some great off season moves and will be a force this year in the circuit but you can't seed on speculation. You have to go off of the circuit last year. This being the first tournament of 2012 the seeding should be determined by how teams finished last year.

by Captain_Relax » January 3rd, 2012, 9:57 am
krabbas wrote:J-Hasty wrote:Really I always feel like the number one seeds in a bracket are picked and then a random draw from that? Hence why meatballs and panic are never in the same bracket.
Who's gonna get the pool of death cause I have a feeling there will be one!!!
Just looking at the list of teams signed up, there will probably be multiple "pools of death". I can't wait for this damn tourney.

by Jersey3bFP » January 3rd, 2012, 10:13 am
JellyDogg wrote:Jersey3bFP wrote:I'm also trying to figure out how you'd seed a team like JKI over OSC and NYSH. Understandably they have made some great off season moves and will be a force this year in the circuit but you can't seed on speculation. You have to go off of the circuit last year. This being the first tournament of 2012 the seeding should be determined by how teams finished last year.
It's not important if 1-8 are seeded exactly right. In fact, there's really no difference in how the pools are structured if you're the 1 seed or the 8 seed. The seeds just prevent those top teams from facing each other in pool. Gaining a higher starting seed offers no protection from being a in a pool of death.

by JellyDogg » January 3rd, 2012, 10:22 am
Jersey3bFP wrote:
I disagree, obviously 1-8 have an advantage but the higher your seed the lesser the seeds are that you'll play against.

by Jersey3bFP » January 3rd, 2012, 10:49 am

by kim dude » January 3rd, 2012, 11:03 am
by JellyDogg » January 3rd, 2012, 11:17 am
J-Hasty wrote:So with that beining said who do you guys think is the 1-8 teams?

by JohnPWilks » January 3rd, 2012, 11:25 am

by J-Hasty » January 3rd, 2012, 11:32 am
JellyDogg wrote:J-Hasty wrote:So with that beining said who do you guys think is the 1-8 teams?
I think Meatballs, JKI, OSC, NYSH, and LIU would be ranked. Sofa would be, too, if they come out. Sitch, Relax, Flying V, and a few SoFl teams (MMS, GOMK, FL) - need more info on these teams - would be in the running for the final 3-4 spots.

by Captain_Relax » January 3rd, 2012, 11:54 am
JellyDogg wrote:J-Hasty wrote:So with that beining said who do you guys think is the 1-8 teams?
I think Meatballs, JKI, OSC, NYSH, and LIU would be ranked. Sofa would be, too, if they come out. Sitch, Relax, Flying V, and a few SoFl teams (MMS, GOMK, FL) - need more info on these teams - would be in the running for the final 3-4 spots.

by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 11:56 am
J-Hasty wrote:JellyDogg wrote:J-Hasty wrote:So with that beining said who do you guys think is the 1-8 teams?
I think Meatballs, JKI, OSC, NYSH, and LIU would be ranked. Sofa would be, too, if they come out. Sitch, Relax, Flying V, and a few SoFl teams (MMS, GOMK, FL) - need more info on these teams - would be in the running for the final 3-4 spots.
Well I'll just speak for GOMK. GOMK is 2-0 against FL. We beat MMS in the playoffs this year, beat balls deep in the playoffs last year when there was still a balls deep. Tied the meatballs before they split and has only lost to the Meatballs or a form of the Meatballs (Pizza Fushion) in the playoffs.
So yeah I am politicking for one of those spots!
by Captain_Relax » January 3rd, 2012, 12:06 pm
krabbas wrote:J-Hasty wrote:JellyDogg wrote:J-Hasty wrote:So with that beining said who do you guys think is the 1-8 teams?
I think Meatballs, JKI, OSC, NYSH, and LIU would be ranked. Sofa would be, too, if they come out. Sitch, Relax, Flying V, and a few SoFl teams (MMS, GOMK, FL) - need more info on these teams - would be in the running for the final 3-4 spots.
Well I'll just speak for GOMK. GOMK is 2-0 against FL. We beat MMS in the playoffs this year, beat balls deep in the playoffs last year when there was still a balls deep. Tied the meatballs before they split and has only lost to the Meatballs or a form of the Meatballs (Pizza Fushion) in the playoffs.
So yeah I am politicking for one of those spots!
^THIS is the reason why I think arbitrary seeding is not the way to go. Teams that have a greater message board presence receive higher seeds simply because they are more vocal. (see Flying V in 2011).
In my opinion, every tournament until the Cup should be randomly seeded or at least World Cup style draws. It's the fairest way to do it.

by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 12:09 pm
by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 12:13 pm
by Captain_Relax » January 3rd, 2012, 12:18 pm

by Captain_Relax » January 3rd, 2012, 12:21 pm
krabbas wrote:Basically, you're giving teams easier schedules in the morning time because of past success. And giving teams without the same success in the past a harder schedule... It'd be like MLB giving the St. Louis Cardinals (Meatballs) the easiest schedule in 2012, because they won the World Series in 2011. MLB would also end up giving easier schedules to Boston and New York because they are always hyped up in the media (the Flying Vs on the message board) and why not give an easier schedule to the Marlins too because they signed a bunch of free agents (the JKI Deeps).

by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 12:25 pm
Captain_Relax wrote:Yeah but then you mess up those seedings with a random seeding of tournaments throughout the year. At least seeding the Top 8 you avoid the top teams being in the same pool and having to match up against each other. I don't think you can just discredit last year and past years performances.
by Jared It Up! » January 3rd, 2012, 12:35 pm
krabbas wrote:Basically, you're giving teams easier schedules in the morning time because of past success. And giving teams without the same success in the past a harder schedule... It'd be like MLB giving the St. Louis Cardinals (Meatballs) the easiest schedule in 2012, because they won the World Series in 2011. MLB would also end up giving easier schedules to Boston and New York because they are always hyped up in the media (the Flying Vs on the message board) and why not give an easier schedule to the Marlins too because they signed a bunch of free agents (the JKI Deeps).


by Captain_Relax » January 3rd, 2012, 12:40 pm
krabbas wrote:Why is it so important to decrease the odds of the top teams having difficult pools, when that means you increase the odds of the lower tiered teams having difficult pools? Why are the top teams a protected class? Does #occupywallstreet know about this?
2011 should have no bearing on how seeds in 2012 are determined. But even if you did want to rank based on 2011 results, there isn't really a clear/fair way to do it. Like you said, beyond the top couple teams, it's a toss up. Which benefits the teams that have a more vocal presence on the boards.

by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 12:49 pm
Captain_Relax wrote:krabbas wrote:Why is it so important to decrease the odds of the top teams having difficult pools, when that means you increase the odds of the lower tiered teams having difficult pools? Why are the top teams a protected class? Does #occupywallstreet know about this?
2011 should have no bearing on how seeds in 2012 are determined. But even if you did want to rank based on 2011 results, there isn't really a clear/fair way to do it. Like you said, beyond the top couple teams, it's a toss up. Which benefits the teams that have a more vocal presence on the boards.
Because if 3 of the top 5 are in the same pool, 1 may not even get out of pool play, where you may have another pool of 5 new teams who all suck and two get to advance. This shouldn't be an everyone's created equal type of thing. Teams seeded based on past results and general knowledge is the best way to get the best teams to the final round, which I think is what we all want. Sure it's tough to rank the last few seeds if you're doing an 8 seed tournament but even then, if you're on the edge of receiving the 5-8 you're going to be in a similar position as the 9-12.
by krabbas » January 3rd, 2012, 12:53 pm
Jared It Up! wrote:krabbas wrote:Basically, you're giving teams easier schedules in the morning time because of past success. And giving teams without the same success in the past a harder schedule... It'd be like MLB giving the St. Louis Cardinals (Meatballs) the easiest schedule in 2012, because they won the World Series in 2011. MLB would also end up giving easier schedules to Boston and New York because they are always hyped up in the media (the Flying Vs on the message board) and why not give an easier schedule to the Marlins too because they signed a bunch of free agents (the JKI Deeps).
you can't compare a tournament to a full season, it just doesn't work that way. You forgot to include that higher seed in most sports gets an easy schedule after the season in the playoffs. Baseball is a tough one because only 4 teams make it.
It is fine to seed in my opinion. With random, you can theoretically end up with the top 5 teams in one pool and another pool can be the bottom 5 teams. At the end of pool play, you could have the 4th and 5th place team not in single elim. That doesn't seem right to me, plus, the circuit offers money for the top teams that accumulate circuit points, so it would make the point champion luck of the draw.
by kim dude » January 3rd, 2012, 1:02 pm
by JellyDogg » January 3rd, 2012, 1:32 pm
