by Dematas » May 28th, 2012, 10:20 am

by Typod » May 28th, 2012, 10:48 am
Trey it Up wrote:JKID (pre-Tiger) at SFKO - 43 runs scored
JKID (post-Tiger) at LSKO and JKO combined - 32 runs scored

by Trey it Up » May 28th, 2012, 11:32 am
Trey it Up wrote:
JKID (pre-Tiger) at SFKO - 43 runs scored
JKID (post-Tiger) at LSKO and JKO combined - 32 runs scored
Did LIU have their worst tourney in years (possibly ever) after adding you?

by MEATBALLKEVIN » May 28th, 2012, 1:47 pm
Dematas wrote:Well Kev, you obviously don't have the confidence to bunt with two fouls and you said a #3 kicker needs to be able to bunt and get on if the first 2 kickers get out. And you tried to kick and got out and we all remember what happened in NYC with you up in a big spot kicking.

by Dematas » May 28th, 2012, 3:38 pm
Trey it Up wrote:Trey it Up wrote:
JKID (pre-Tiger) at SFKO - 43 runs scored
JKID (post-Tiger) at LSKO and JKO combined - 32 runs scored
Did LIU have their worst tourney in years (possibly ever) after adding you?
I'm not sure. If so, it certainly wasn't because of my performance. I'm not sure what my exact stats were, but I can only remember two times where I got out.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

by Dematas » May 28th, 2012, 10:46 pm
MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Dematas wrote:Well Kev, you obviously don't have the confidence to bunt with two fouls and you said a #3 kicker needs to be able to bunt and get on if the first 2 kickers get out. And you tried to kick and got out and we all remember what happened in NYC with you up in a big spot kicking.
Yep. Nyc will be in my head forever.
But was not trying for single in 1st. double or nothing

by MEATBALLKEVIN » May 29th, 2012, 6:54 am
Dematas wrote:MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Dematas wrote:Well Kev, you obviously don't have the confidence to bunt with two fouls and you said a #3 kicker needs to be able to bunt and get on if the first 2 kickers get out. And you tried to kick and got out and we all remember what happened in NYC with you up in a big spot kicking.
Yep. Nyc will be in my head forever.
But was not trying for single in 1st. double or nothing
So you were bunting until you got two fouls and then you try and kick for a double or nothing? What if you bunted and got on?

by Zak » May 29th, 2012, 8:31 am
Typod wrote:Trey it Up wrote:JKID (pre-Tiger) at SFKO - 43 runs scored
JKID (post-Tiger) at LSKO and JKO combined - 32 runs scored
Did LIU have their worst tourney in years (possibly ever) after adding you?

by Dematas » May 29th, 2012, 9:17 am
MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Dematas wrote:MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Dematas wrote:Well Kev, you obviously don't have the confidence to bunt with two fouls and you said a #3 kicker needs to be able to bunt and get on if the first 2 kickers get out. And you tried to kick and got out and we all remember what happened in NYC with you up in a big spot kicking.
Yep. Nyc will be in my head forever.
But was not trying for single in 1st. double or nothing
So you were bunting until you got two fouls and then you try and kick for a double or nothing? What if you bunted and got on?
No. I kicked all 3 of those foul. 8 pitches.

by krabbas » May 29th, 2012, 9:33 am
Zak Loaded wrote:Typod wrote:Trey it Up wrote:JKID (pre-Tiger) at SFKO - 43 runs scored
JKID (post-Tiger) at LSKO and JKO combined - 32 runs scored
Did LIU have their worst tourney in years (possibly ever) after adding you?
At the least 2nd worst, TKO 2009 crushed by the Others 1st round of elimination.
by Dematas » May 29th, 2012, 12:05 pm

by krabbas » May 29th, 2012, 12:36 pm
Dematas wrote:Yeah, I believe it was the tourney right next to where they have the Legg Mason tennis event. And I believe it was a run rule by Meatballs if I am not mistaken.
by Zak » May 29th, 2012, 1:06 pm
krabbas wrote:Zak Loaded wrote:Typod wrote:Trey it Up wrote:JKID (pre-Tiger) at SFKO - 43 runs scored
JKID (post-Tiger) at LSKO and JKO combined - 32 runs scored
Did LIU have their worst tourney in years (possibly ever) after adding you?
At the least 2nd worst, TKO 2009 crushed by the Others 1st round of elimination.
Didnt they get beat pretty good in the 1st round of one of the DC tourneys a few years ago too?

by Return of Ctiger » May 30th, 2012, 11:46 am
MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Look at Jkid's declining offensive stats since Tigger joined. It's no surprise they've been one of the worst offensive teams in kickball in that time. Just because he kicks third doesn't mean he SHOULD kick third. They'd probably be better off with just about anyone else in that position.
For THAT day i think it was a smart move by Simon having him 3 just based on who drove up for them.
But i dont feel he is a full time #3 kicker
#3 kickers need to:
when 1 and 2 get on 3 needs to move them over 100% of the time. NEVER foul out or pop up in that situation.
Can bunt to get on if needed
Can kick if line up rolls over
Smart base runner. knows how to bait the defense in to making a throw or not getting ball back to mound. Knows how to get out on purpose in a productive way.
Can handle pressure. If has a bad at bat gets over it and moves on. Does not have days batting under .600 ever with 100% at sacs when needed.
I dont think Tiger fits that description with his past. He is more of a #9 or 10 guy. All rolls are important and if you are in the top 10 ou most likely kick twice anyway so it doesnt matter when you are up because every at bat for a team in tghe game in key. You just need the right players in the right spots that day

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 11:59 am

by Return of Ctiger » May 30th, 2012, 12:02 pm
Trey it Up wrote:Only getting on base once out of five attempts with runners on 1st and 2nd is pretty terrible.

by Dematas » May 30th, 2012, 12:09 pm
Trey it Up wrote:Only getting on base once out of five attempts with runners on 1st and 2nd is pretty terrible.

by RED » May 30th, 2012, 12:18 pm
Return of Ctiger wrote:MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Look at Jkid's declining offensive stats since Tigger joined. It's no surprise they've been one of the worst offensive teams in kickball in that time. Just because he kicks third doesn't mean he SHOULD kick third. They'd probably be better off with just about anyone else in that position.
For THAT day i think it was a smart move by Simon having him 3 just based on who drove up for them.
But i dont feel he is a full time #3 kicker
#3 kickers need to:
when 1 and 2 get on 3 needs to move them over 100% of the time. NEVER foul out or pop up in that situation.
Can bunt to get on if needed
Can kick if line up rolls over
Smart base runner. knows how to bait the defense in to making a throw or not getting ball back to mound. Knows how to get out on purpose in a productive way.
Can handle pressure. If has a bad at bat gets over it and moves on. Does not have days batting under .600 ever with 100% at sacs when needed.
I dont think Tiger fits that description with his past. He is more of a #9 or 10 guy. All rolls are important and if you are in the top 10 ou most likely kick twice anyway so it doesnt matter when you are up because every at bat for a team in tghe game in key. You just need the right players in the right spots that day
Since on JKID-
5 times I came up with runners on 1st and 2nd, and 5 times I moved them over, including 1 time beating it out as well to load the bases
Am batting just around .700 and have been on base every single game except for against you guys (corey holland)
Only time I really had to kick I drove in a run against Lights out in Austin
Have probably never been on 1st base with a runner on 3rd.. Always know when to go to second, and am a good baserunner
As far as pressure- Against one of the texas teams in Austin we won 2-1 and I drove in one run, and got on to lead off the last inning and scored the eventual winning run. Against Pounders in Jax I lead off the last inning with us down by 1 and scored to tie it up. Against Fully Loaded in our pool play game we were down 4-0 our 2 batter lead off and got on.. I followed that by getting on, and we were a line drive away from the game ending in a tie after putting up 3 in that inning.. Then in our game against them in single elim in the last inning our 2 batter got on, I followed by getting on.. we didn't score, but I did my job.. tell me how I shouldn't be the 3 kicker?

by Return of Ctiger » May 30th, 2012, 12:25 pm
RED wrote:Return of Ctiger wrote:MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Look at Jkid's declining offensive stats since Tigger joined. It's no surprise they've been one of the worst offensive teams in kickball in that time. Just because he kicks third doesn't mean he SHOULD kick third. They'd probably be better off with just about anyone else in that position.
For THAT day i think it was a smart move by Simon having him 3 just based on who drove up for them.
But i dont feel he is a full time #3 kicker
#3 kickers need to:
when 1 and 2 get on 3 needs to move them over 100% of the time. NEVER foul out or pop up in that situation.
Can bunt to get on if needed
Can kick if line up rolls over
Smart base runner. knows how to bait the defense in to making a throw or not getting ball back to mound. Knows how to get out on purpose in a productive way.
Can handle pressure. If has a bad at bat gets over it and moves on. Does not have days batting under .600 ever with 100% at sacs when needed.
I dont think Tiger fits that description with his past. He is more of a #9 or 10 guy. All rolls are important and if you are in the top 10 ou most likely kick twice anyway so it doesnt matter when you are up because every at bat for a team in tghe game in key. You just need the right players in the right spots that day
Since on JKID-
5 times I came up with runners on 1st and 2nd, and 5 times I moved them over, including 1 time beating it out as well to load the bases
Am batting just around .700 and have been on base every single game except for against you guys (corey holland)
Only time I really had to kick I drove in a run against Lights out in Austin
Have probably never been on 1st base with a runner on 3rd.. Always know when to go to second, and am a good baserunner
As far as pressure- Against one of the texas teams in Austin we won 2-1 and I drove in one run, and got on to lead off the last inning and scored the eventual winning run. Against Pounders in Jax I lead off the last inning with us down by 1 and scored to tie it up. Against Fully Loaded in our pool play game we were down 4-0 our 2 batter lead off and got on.. I followed that by getting on, and we were a line drive away from the game ending in a tie after putting up 3 in that inning.. Then in our game against them in single elim in the last inning our 2 batter got on, I followed by getting on.. we didn't score, but I did my job.. tell me how I shouldn't be the 3 kicker?
lil tig...
the fact that you have to come on here to justify your play at a position is stupid. the fact that you remember all your stats to come on the BOARDS and justify that you are a GOOD PLAYER shows what kind of teammate you are! who cares if your in the outfield and you catch a ball. who cares if your up and you kick a pop up. YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!!!! nobody cares about your personal stats!! its all about if you win

by FlyingV » May 30th, 2012, 12:30 pm
RED wrote:Return of Ctiger wrote:MEATBALLKEVIN wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Look at Jkid's declining offensive stats since Tigger joined. It's no surprise they've been one of the worst offensive teams in kickball in that time. Just because he kicks third doesn't mean he SHOULD kick third. They'd probably be better off with just about anyone else in that position.
For THAT day i think it was a smart move by Simon having him 3 just based on who drove up for them.
But i dont feel he is a full time #3 kicker
#3 kickers need to:
when 1 and 2 get on 3 needs to move them over 100% of the time. NEVER foul out or pop up in that situation.
Can bunt to get on if needed
Can kick if line up rolls over
Smart base runner. knows how to bait the defense in to making a throw or not getting ball back to mound. Knows how to get out on purpose in a productive way.
Can handle pressure. If has a bad at bat gets over it and moves on. Does not have days batting under .600 ever with 100% at sacs when needed.
I dont think Tiger fits that description with his past. He is more of a #9 or 10 guy. All rolls are important and if you are in the top 10 ou most likely kick twice anyway so it doesnt matter when you are up because every at bat for a team in tghe game in key. You just need the right players in the right spots that day
Since on JKID-
5 times I came up with runners on 1st and 2nd, and 5 times I moved them over, including 1 time beating it out as well to load the bases
Am batting just around .700 and have been on base every single game except for against you guys (corey holland)
Only time I really had to kick I drove in a run against Lights out in Austin
Have probably never been on 1st base with a runner on 3rd.. Always know when to go to second, and am a good baserunner
As far as pressure- Against one of the texas teams in Austin we won 2-1 and I drove in one run, and got on to lead off the last inning and scored the eventual winning run. Against Pounders in Jax I lead off the last inning with us down by 1 and scored to tie it up. Against Fully Loaded in our pool play game we were down 4-0 our 2 batter lead off and got on.. I followed that by getting on, and we were a line drive away from the game ending in a tie after putting up 3 in that inning.. Then in our game against them in single elim in the last inning our 2 batter got on, I followed by getting on.. we didn't score, but I did my job.. tell me how I shouldn't be the 3 kicker?
lil tig...
the fact that you have to come on here to justify your play at a position is stupid. the fact that you remember all your stats to come on the BOARDS and justify that you are a GOOD PLAYER shows what kind of teammate you are! who cares if your in the outfield and you catch a ball. who cares if your up and you kick a pop up. YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!!!! nobody cares about your personal stats!! its all about if you win

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 12:41 pm
Dematas wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Only getting on base once out of five attempts with runners on 1st and 2nd is pretty terrible.
Trey, when are you going to realize that everyone cannot be as good as you?

by Duff » May 30th, 2012, 12:50 pm

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 12:55 pm

by Catch-22 » May 30th, 2012, 1:01 pm
Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.

by btaylor » May 30th, 2012, 1:07 pm
Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.

by Duff » May 30th, 2012, 1:24 pm

by FlyingV » May 30th, 2012, 1:38 pm
Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.
Can we get some proof? Can you cite some minimum number of game tapes showing Panik's #3 getting on in this situation?

by kwido03 » May 30th, 2012, 1:40 pm

by Catch-22 » May 30th, 2012, 1:49 pm
FlyingV wrote:Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.
Can we get some proof? Can you cite some minimum number of game tapes showing Panik's #3 getting on in this situation?
Dan is one of the best in the game in the #3 spot. It helps when you're 7 feet down the 1st baseline at almost the same instant you bunt the ball... I'd be shocked if there was a tournament he batted under .500 (and that includes counting a sac as 0-1)

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 2:05 pm
Catch-22 wrote:FlyingV wrote:Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.
Can we get some proof? Can you cite some minimum number of game tapes showing Panik's #3 getting on in this situation?
Dan is one of the best in the game in the #3 spot. It helps when you're 7 feet down the 1st baseline at almost the same instant you bunt the ball... I'd be shocked if there was a tournament he batted under .500 (and that includes counting a sac as 0-1)
Dan's fantastic. I'm sure he kicks better than .500 overall. But Trey said their #3 kicks better than .500 with runners on 1 and 2.

by FlyingV » May 30th, 2012, 2:09 pm
Catch-22 wrote:FlyingV wrote:Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.
Can we get some proof? Can you cite some minimum number of game tapes showing Panik's #3 getting on in this situation?
Dan is one of the best in the game in the #3 spot. It helps when you're 7 feet down the 1st baseline at almost the same instant you bunt the ball... I'd be shocked if there was a tournament he batted under .500 (and that includes counting a sac as 0-1)
Dan's fantastic. I'm sure he kicks better than .500 overall. But Trey said their #3 kicks better than .500 with runners on 1 and 2.

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 2:18 pm
FlyingV wrote:That could be a fairly small sample size, but without any stats in front of me I'd still have to say Trey is probably right. Dan is a machine at any time he's up to bat, regardless of who's on base.
There are a few things constant with Panik- Tyler leading off, Dan batting #3 and McCoy batting 5th. They usually fill in the #2 and #4 spot with whoever comes, but those (3) spots rarely change.

by Catch-22 » May 30th, 2012, 2:36 pm
Trey it Up wrote:Catch-22 wrote:FlyingV wrote:Catch-22 wrote:Trey it Up wrote:Panik has never had a #3 kicker go less than .500 with runners on 1st and 2nd. In any tournament. Ever.
Can we get some proof? Can you cite some minimum number of game tapes showing Panik's #3 getting on in this situation?
Dan is one of the best in the game in the #3 spot. It helps when you're 7 feet down the 1st baseline at almost the same instant you bunt the ball... I'd be shocked if there was a tournament he batted under .500 (and that includes counting a sac as 0-1)
Dan's fantastic. I'm sure he kicks better than .500 overall. But Trey said their #3 kicks better than .500 with runners on 1 and 2.
You have access to every Panik video the rest of us do. It should be easy to disprove that our #3 kickers go under.500 with runners on 1st and 2nd in recorded games (mostly semis and finals). I'd be shocked if you could prove we go less than .500 in finals and semis. Our average is much, much better in pool play and early elimination.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 3:10 pm

by Trey it Up » May 30th, 2012, 3:20 pm

by Duff » May 30th, 2012, 3:47 pm
Trey it Up wrote:And you practice law by the same "guilty until proven innocent" approach? Or are you not practicing law yet? Doesn't the University of Phoenix law program teach you better?

by McNugget » May 30th, 2012, 4:08 pm
Trey it Up wrote:How's this for a challenge. I challenge you to find one video where Panik had 1st and 2nd and the #3 got out. Even a novice interneter such as yourself should be able to quickly provide copious amounts of evidence for that, right?

by Duff » May 30th, 2012, 4:14 pm

by FlyingV » May 30th, 2012, 4:16 pm
Duff wrote:In GKO (the second time around the lineup) Dan got on also on a close play.
Redundant lesson learned: Dan is fast, tall, and can leap baselines in a single bound.

by Duff » May 30th, 2012, 4:25 pm
FlyingV wrote:Duff wrote:In GKO (the second time around the lineup) Dan got on also on a close play.
Redundant lesson learned: Dan is fast, tall, and can leap baselines in a single bound.
And Trey is right...

